03:00 Thu 31 Oct 2019
Salt Lake Potash Ltd - September 2019 Quarterly Report
| AIM/ASX Code: SO4
|
|
The Board of
HIGHLIGHTS
Completion of Bankable Feasibility Study (BFS) (announced
§ Exceptional economics with estimated project post-tax NPV8 of
§ Steady state Project EBITDA of
§ Strong cash flow and low capital costs result in early payback period of 3.5 years
§ First quartile operating costs for global SOP producers with a C1 cash cost estimate of
§ Low development capital requirements of approximately
Significant Lake Way Ore Reserve Estimate
§ High-grade Probable Ore Reserve Estimate of 5.4Mt SOP (2.4Mt contained potassium at an initial grade of 6.8kg/m3) underpins a 20-year life of mine
§ Increase in the paleochannel basal sands Mineral Resource Estimate of ~57% to 6.0Mt SOP in Total Porosity at 6.1kg/m3 of potassium (2.2Mt in Drainable Porosity) supports additional production bores
§ Excess sulphates at Lake Way enables production of an estimated 245,000t per annum of premium grade SOP with the addition of 42,360t per annum KCl
Premium product confirmed
§ Very high grade potassium (>53% K2O) product confirmed, with a low chloride (<0.1% Cl) and insoluble particle content (<0.1%), and dissolution rate of >95% in one minute
§ Premium grade specifications from independent pilot plant testwork supports premium pricing
Acquisition of strategic tenement package completed
§ Completion of the acquisition of strategic package of Lake Way tenements and access to process water and power rights from Blackham Resources
§ Transaction provides security of tenure and significant synergies for the
Lake Way Project Financing Secured
§ Project financing of up to
§ The debt is a staged facility to support the rapid development of the
o Stage 1 Facility -
o Project Development Facility -
§ Draw down of the Stage 1 Facility has commenced with funds used for On
Fast Tracked to Production
§ Existing Mining Leases on Lake Way tenements has provided an advanced permitting pathway for early development activity
§ Completion of Stage 1 evaporation ponds has enabled dewatering of super saturated brine (25kg/m3 SOP) from the
§ Contracts executed for long lead items include:
o Veolia Water Technologies to supply the SOP crystalliser package
o Complete Hire & Sales for supply of permanent accommodation village
o Mak Water for supply of RO and waste water treatment plant
Next steps following successful completion of the BFS
· Continued construction on Lake Way with the commencement of the next stage of evaporation ponds and brine extraction infrastructure
· Procurement of long lead items for the Process Plant and Non-Process Infrastructure in line with the advanced Project Schedule
· Execution of Native Title Agreement over Lake Way
· Execution of key offtake agreements with preferred marketing partners
· Detailed design and documentation advancing
lake way Project Overview
Lake Way is located in the
SO4 currently holds nine Mining Leases and six Exploration Licences[1] which cover the whole of the Lake Way surface and key strategic areas off-lake, including the extensive paleochannel and proposed process plant and village area. The Company has secured several Miscellaneous Licenses within the surrounding Lake Way area to support key infrastructure including process water bore fields, gas pipelines and access roads.
The recently completed transaction with
Lake Way has a number of compelling advantages which make it an ideal site for SO4's initial SOP operation, including:
§ Granted Mining Leases with approvals that enables immediate construction (Stage 1 evaporation ponds complete, Stage 2 evaporation ponds targeted to commence in Q4 2019)
§ The site has excellent freight solutions being adjacent to the
§ The Goldfields Gas Pipeline is adjacent to SO4 tenements, running past the eastern side of the Lake
§ Existing site haul roads and service roads including the Williamson Pit Causeway that connects the proposed process plant area to the on-lake production ponds
§
§ Access to an exceptionally high grade brine of 25kg/m3 of SOP from the
§ The high grade brines at Lake Way will deliver lower capital and operating costs due to lower extraction and evaporation requirements
§ The presence of clays in the upper levels of the lake which are amenable to low cost, on-lake evaporation pond construction
Bankable feasibility study
In
Strengthening the Scoping Study results
The BFS incorporated a number of changes to the previous Scoping Study, including a revised processing methodology to include the addition of potassium chloride (KCl) which has increased the annual production rate to 245,000t and delivered improved economic outcomes. While the addition of KCl to the process plant has increased the C1 cash cost from the previous estimate in the Scoping Study, SO4 will achieve better capital intensity and maintain its position as a low cost producer at
Changes in key financial metrics for the Project from the Scoping Study to the BFS are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1: Comparison of key financial metrics
Metric | Unit | Scoping Study | BFS | % change |
Production | tpa | 200,000 | 245,000 | 22.5% |
Life of mine | years | 20 | 20 | ― |
First production | Qtr | Q4 2020 | Q4 2020 | ― |
C1 cash cost | A$/t | 264 | 302 | 14.4% |
Capital cost | A$m | 237 | 254 | 7.2% |
Capital intensity | A$/t | 1,185 | 1,038 | (12.6%) |
NPV8 (post-tax) | A$m | 381 | 479 | 25.7% |
IRR (post-tax) | % | 27% | 28% | 3.7% |
NPV8 (pre-tax) | A$m | 580 | 696 | 20.0% |
IRR (pre-tax) | % | 33% | 38% | 15.2% |
EBITDA1 | A$m | 90 | 111 | 23.3% |
Payback period | years | 3.2 | 3.5 | 7.9% |
Probable Ore Reserve | Mt K | - | 2.4 | ― |
Note 1: Refers to average annual Project cash flows during steady-state production.
SO4 has significantly advanced development of the Project since the Scoping Study, including completion of 125ha of evaporation ponds which are now filled with high grade brine (25kg/m3 SOP) from the
Fast tracked production to maximise value
The optimised capital expenditure plan has considered a staged approach to pond construction that aligns with the plant ramp-up schedule and steady-state production requirements, enabling some initial capital expenditure to be deferred for a period of up to 12 months.
Lowest quartile operating costs
The results of the BFS demonstrate the potential for very low operating costs. It is estimated that the Project will have one of the lowest operating costs of any SOP operation globally with a C1 cash cost of
Robust economics
The BFS further demonstrates the potential for the Project to support an exceptionally high margin over a 20-year life of mine through the production of high grade, premium SOP. This combined with the low capital intensity delivers very strong returns with a post-tax IRR of 28%.
Market analysis by
Table 2: Comparison of key financial metrics1
SOP price | Breakeven | | | US500/t | Base | | |
NPV8 (post tax) | - | 187 | 285 | 382 | 479 | 575 | 672 |
Note 1: Equivalent adjustment to the value of potassium assumed for KCl input cost.
The BFS demonstrates that, even in the most extreme downside pricing scenarios, the Project continues to deliver robust economic returns. The breakeven pricing scenario of
Project funding advanced
SO4 has previously announced that it reached an agreement with Taurus Funds Management (Taurus) for financing up to
Key Project Metrics
Table 3: Key Project Metrics
Element | Unit | Value |
Physical | | |
Life of mine | years | 20 |
Annual SOP production | tpa | 245,000 |
Production plan | | |
Ore reserve | | |
Brine volume | GL | 474 |
Brine grade (LOM average) | kg/m3 K | 5.0 |
Contained potassium | Mt | 2.4 |
Production method1 | | |
Trenches | km | 132 |
Bores | No. | 18 |
Evaporation ponds | | |
Halite ponds | ha | 686 |
Harvest ponds | ha | 96 |
Recovery of potassium from brine | % | 91% |
Process plant | | |
Operating time | hours/yr | 7,600 |
Harvest salt to plant | Mtpa | 2.27 |
KCl addition | tpa | 42,360 |
Recovery of potassium from harvest salt | % | 84% |
Operating and capital costs | | |
Operating costs | | |
Mine gate cash operating cost | A$/t | 240 |
Transport and handling cost | A$/t | 62 |
C1 cash cost | A$/t | 302 |
Capital costs | | |
Direct cost | A$m | 157 |
Indirect cost | A$m | 76 |
Contingency | A$m | 21 |
Total capital cost | A$m | 254 |
Financial performance | | |
Price (FOB) | US$/t | 550 |
Exchange rate | A$/US$ | 0.68 |
Discount rate | % | 8% |
NPV8 (post-tax) | A$m | 479 |
IRR (post-tax) | % | 28% |
NPV8 (pre-tax) | A$m | 696 |
IRR (pre-tax) | % | 38% |
EBITDA2 | A$m | 111 |
Post tax annual cash flow2 | A$m | 78 |
Payback | years | 3.5 |
Note 1: Refers to initial trench and bore development included in the capital cost estimate.
Note 2: Refers to average annual Project cash flows during steady-state production.
Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves
A Mineral Resource Estimate for the whole of Lake Way was first reported to the ASX
Since publication of the
HydroGeoEnviro completed a number of column leach tests to substantiate the leaching potential of potassium from the retained porosity of the lake bed sediments. This testing supports the modelling of changes in potassium grade over the life of mine, in particular the effects of rainfall recharge and lake filling events.
Reported Mineral Resources
The total Measured Mineral Resources Estimate from the northern lake bed and the paleochannel calculated using Drainable Porosity is estimated at 2.0Mt, an increase of 15% from the
The total Indicated Mineral Resource Estimate within the remaining portion of the paleochannel calculated using Drainable Porosity is estimated at 2.0Mt, an increase of 43%, and 5.3Mt using Total Porosity, a 43% increase.
The remaining lake bed and paleochannel clay resource is classified as Inferred.
The Mineral Resource estimate for Lake Way (inclusive of the Ore Reserve reported in Table 5) is detailed in Table 4.
Table 4: Lake Way Mineral Resource
Resource component | Total volume | Brine grade | Mineral Tonnage | Mineral Tonnage | ||||||||
| | K | Mg | SO4 | Total porosity | Brine volume | SOP tonnage | Drainable porosity | Brine volume | SOP tonnage | ||
| (Mm3) | (kg/m3) | (kg/m3) | (kg/m3) | % | (Mm3) | (Mt) | % | (Mm3) | (Mt) | ||
Measured | | | | | | | | | | | ||
North lake bed sediment (0.4-8.0m) | 1,060 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 27.6 | 0.43 | 452 | 6.9 | 0.11 | 117 | 1.8 | ||
Paleochannel basal sands | 119 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 25.0 | 0.40 | 48 | 0.7 | 0.15 | 18 | 0.2 | ||
Indicated | | | | | | | | | | | ||
Paleochannel basal sands | 981 | 6.1 | 8.2 | 25.0 | 0.40 | 384 | 5.3 | 0.15 | 147 | 2.0 | ||
Inferred | | | | | | | | | | | ||
South lake bed sediment (0.4-8.0m) | 316 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 27.6 | 0.43 | 135 | 2.0 | 0.11 | 35 | 0.5 | ||
Paleochannel sediment | 15,200 | 6.8 | 8.0 | 27.6 | 0.40 | 6,080 | 92.2 | 0.03 | 456 | 6.9 | ||
Total | | | | | | | 107.1 | | | 11.4 | ||
Brines by their nature are not a static resource as they are subject to groundwater movement, dilution and grade depletion over time. Reporting both Total Porosity and Drainable Porosity allows the reflection of this dynamic resource environment, including the consideration of the recharge, leaching and physical diffusion impacts on the mine plan and production output.
Reporting of Ore Reserves
The Ore Reserve estimate is based on the brine volume and grade that will be produced for a defined period and a specific abstraction scheme. The grade of produced brine will change over time as leakage, mixing and rainfall-recharge occurs within the aquifer.
The Ore Reserve is based on a production plan comprising a combination of surface trenches and bores. The brine pumping rate and brine grade incorporated in the production plan is based on the results of detailed numerical modelling of the lake bed sediments and paleochannel. The model outlines the brine production profile from a combination of surface trenches and bores, capable of delivering 118,700t per annum of contained potassium to the evaporation ponds
The initial brine extraction rate after a 12-month ramp-up period is 18.2GL per annum with 71% of brine to be sourced from trenches and the remaining 29% from bores. Over time the production plan will shift to compensate a decline in brine grade within the lake playa and maintain the steady-state production requirements of 118,700t per annum of contained potassium to the evaporation ponds, with increased brine sourced from bores. During the final years of the mine plan, an expanded network of bores will be used to source 47% of the total brine from the paleochannel.
The numerical model used to simulate the production plan employs the aquifer properties used in the Mineral Resource Estimate and incorporates other modifying factors (such as recharge and evapotranspiration) to predict brine production and brine grade over the life of mine. A steady state calibration and extensive sensitivity analysis was undertaken.
Two models were developed to simulate production of the resource:
§ A regional groundwater flow model was developed to simulate the combined brine production from a trench network and a paleochannel borefield to meet the proposed production target of 118,700ktpa of contained potassium at Lake Way for 20 years.
§ Cross-sectional flow and transport models were developed to estimate the decline of brine grade with time, and to test the dependence of the predictions on density and viscosity.
The models were used to define the base case production plan that will achieve annual brine abstraction of 118,700kt of contained potassium, delivered to the evaporation pond network.
To test the robustness of the model, an approach of testing assumptions to failure was employed and the predicted scenario stress-tested monthly for a total length of 20 years (representing the projected mine life). Annual production scenarios were simulated to understand the volume of brine.
No cut-off grade was applied given the large potential of the paleochannel, the manageable dilution rate and the excess of sulphate with respect to potassium (enabling the addition of KCl to the production process).
The Ore Reserve estimate for Lake Way is detailed in Table 5. The brine flow rate and grade estimates are based on modelling and extrapolation of testwork which provides an Ore Reserve classed as Probable.
Table 5: Lake Way Probable Reserve
Mine | Brine | Potassium | Potassium |
(years) | (GL) | (Mt) | (kg/m3) |
20 | 474 | 2.4 | 5.0 |
Note 1: Average grade to be sourced from trenches and bores over LOM.
2.4Mt of contained potassium includes 60% produced from the Measured resource category, and 40% produced from the Indicated resource category. No brine from the Inferred resource category is included in the Ore Reserve.
The results of the test pumping and the consistent nature of the brine grade within the paleochannel mean that the Measured and Indicated Mineral Resource Estimates have been converted to a Probable Ore Reserve.
The northern zone of the lake playa has been classified as a Measured Mineral Resource Estimate for the initial 8m at surface. This resource has been converted to a Probable Ore Reserve given the effects of variable recharge, dilution and liberation of the mineral salts contained within the retained porosity across the lake bed surface.
Premium Grade Water Soluble SOP Produced
In
SRC, the world leading potash processing institute, completed Pilot Plant studies that are representative of the proposed
Two independent Pilot Plant runs utilised 5 tonnes of salt harvested from Lake Way site evaporation trials as feed and produced premium grade, highly water soluble SOP. The Total Solubility and Dissolution Rate indicates the product would be suitable for application in drip irrigation (otherwise known as fertigation) systems.
Table 6: Lake Way Pilot Plant 2 Specifications
| | Specification1 |
Potassium | K2O | >53% |
Sulphate | SO4 | >55% |
Chloride | Cl | <0.1% |
Insolubles | | <0.1% |
Total Solubility | (g/100g H2O) | 11.8 |
Dissolution Rate | % in 1 minute | >95% |
Note 1: Results of composite sample from Pilot Plant 2.
The outstanding results achieved from the Pilot Plant indicate that the product is comparable with other premium grade water soluble products on the market and supports SO4's marketing strategy to supply into the premium SOP markets. The premium achievable for soluble grade SOP can be up to 20%[2] above the standard SOP pricing.
The process flowsheet that has been developed and confirmed as part of the Pilot Plant test work is incorporated in the Lake Way BFS.
Acquisition of strategic tenement package
In
SO4 and Blackham have been cooperating on their respective projects in the
In
Ø the tenements owned by Blackham that sit on the northern end of Lake Way and to the east of the
Ø access and rights to process water from Blackham borefields with an option to outright acquire a key borefield which will underwrite the
Under the Agreement, Blackham agreed to provide immediate access to process water, and consent to the grant of new tenure over its tenements to enable SO4 to advance early works including camps and water infrastructure. The remaining conditions precedent have now been satisfied and the Agreement has completed.
Approvals
Lake Way is located in an area with a long history of minerals exploration and associated environmental assessment. SO4 has taken advantage of existing environmental knowledge to support the permitting of its early works programme and focus additional investigations required for permitting of full-scale operations.
Environmental work to date has not identified any social or environmental factors that could constitute fatal flaws or insurmountable obstacles to gaining necessary statutory approvals. The final outstanding approvals for the Project are currently being progressed.
The referral for Stage 2 Project development works submitted to the
The Company has since received approvals from the
The Company has also obtained Ministerial consent to use the land under section 18 of the Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972.
Further approvals are required for the full commercial scope of the Project with allowance for these approvals included in the Project schedule. The referral for the full scope was submitted to the EPA for assessment in
Native Title and Heritage
SO4 has been working collaboratively with
SO4 and TMPAC have entered into a native title exploration agreement and are finalising a comprehensive land access agreement that provides certainty for the Project, cultural heritage management protocols and lasting social and economic benefits to the native title holders.
Project Funding
In
The arrangement with Taurus is an important step in progressing the development and financing of the
Stage 1 Facility of USD30m (c.AUD44m)
The Stage 1 Facility (Facility) provides initial access to funding for early construction works for the
Formal documentation for the Stage 1 Facility was completed in
Project Development Facility (PDF) of up to USD150m (c.AUD220m)
The PDF will be used for refinancing the Stage 1 Facility and for project development and working capital associated with the development of the
Corporate
Institutional Placement to Fund Acquisition
The Company completed a placement of 10.58 million shares to
Key Appointments
During the Quarter, the Company made a number of key appointments strengthening the already experienced executive team.
Mr Shaun Day commenced in the role of Chief Financial Officer and is responsible for the delivery of the financial, commercial and strategic outcomes for SO4. He is a Chartered Accountant and experienced CFO with over 20 years' experience in executive and financial positions across mining, investment banking and international accounting firms. Most recently, Mr Day was Chief Financial Officer of Northern Star Resources during a period of significant growth with the market cap of
Mr Mark Wilde joined the Company as Director - Sales and Marketing, overseeing these functions. He is an experienced senior sales and marketing executive with more than 30 years' experience working in sales, marketing, business development and technical functions. Most recently, Mr Wilde was Global Sales Director, Sulphate of Potash (SOP) Business Unit, for
Ms Rowena Roberts joined as Director - People, Culture, Heritage and Community. She is responsible for overseeing the human resources, heritage and community relations functions for SO4. Ms Roberts brings a broad depth of knowledge and experience with over 25 years' in People Management, Indigenous Training and Education,
For further information please visit www.so4.com.au or contact:
Tony Swiericzuk / Clint McGhie | | Tel: +61 8 6559 5800 |
Colin Aaronson / Richard Tonthat / Ben Roberts | | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7383 5100 |
Derrick Lee / Peter Lynch | | Tel: +44 (0) 131 220 6939 |
Rupert Fane / Ernest Bell | | Tel: +44 (0) 20 7907 8500 |
The information contained within this announcement is deemed to constitute inside information as stipulated under the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014. Upon the publication of this announcement, this inside information is now considered to be in the public domain.
Appendix A - Competent Person Statement and Disclaimer
Competent Persons Statement
The information in this announcement that relates to Production Targets and Ore Reserves for Lake Way is extracted from the announcement entitled 'Outstanding Bankable Feasibility Results for Lake Way' dated 11 October 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Production Targets and Ore Reserves was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, and Mr Robert Kinnell, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Fellow of the Geological Society of London. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Kinnell is a full time employee of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jeuken and Mr Kinnell have sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which they are undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources for Lake Way is extracted from the announcement entitled 'Outstanding Bankable Feasibility Results for Lake Way' dated 11 October 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Ben Jeuken, who is a member of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a member of the International Association of Hydrogeologists. Mr Jeuken is employed by Groundwater Science Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Jeuken has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity, which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Process Testwork Results is extracted from the announcement entitled 'Premium Grade Water Soluble Sulphate of Potash Produced from Lake Way Salts' dated 18 September 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Process Testwork Results was based on, and fairly represents, information compiled by Mr Bryn Jones, BAppSc (Chem), MEng (Mining) who is a Fellow of the AusIMM. Mr Jones is a Director of Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Jones has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
The information in this announcement that relates to Processing and the Process Plant is extracted from the announcement entitled 'Outstanding Bankable Feasibility Results for Lake Way' dated 11 October 2019. This announcement is available to view on www.so4.com.au. The information in the original ASX Announcement that related to Processing and the Process Plant was based on, and fairly represents, information provided by Mr Kevin Martina, Professional Engineer, who is a Member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Saskatchewan (APEGS), a 'Recognised Professional Organisation' (RPO) included in a list promulgated by the ASX from time to time. Mr Martina is employed by Wood Canada Limited, Saskatoon. Wood is engaged as a consultant by Salt Lake Potash Limited. Mr Martina has sufficient experience, which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking, to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the 'Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves'. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the original market announcement. Salt Lake Potash Limited confirms that the form and context in which the Competent Person's findings are presented have not been materially modified from the original market announcement.
Production Target
The Lake Way 245ktpa Production Target stated in this presentation is based on the Company's Bankable Feasibility Study as released to the ASX on 11 October 2019. The information in relation to the Production Target that the Company is required to include in a public report in accordance with ASX Listing Rule 5.16 and 5.17 was included in the Company's ASX Announcement released on 11 October 2019. The Company confirms that the material assumptions underpinning the Production Target referenced in the 11 October 2019 release continue to apply and have not materially changed.
Forward Looking Statements
This announcement may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on Salt Lake Potash Limited's expectations and beliefs concerning future events. Forward looking statements are necessarily subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside the control of Salt Lake Potash Limited, which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. Salt Lake Potash Limited makes no undertaking to subsequently update or revise the forward-looking statements made in this announcement, to reflect the circumstances or events after the date of that announcement.
Appendix 2 - Summary of Exploration and Mining Tenements as at 30 September 2019
Project | Status | Type of Change | License Number | Interest (%) 30-Jun-19 | Interest (%) 30-Sep-19 |
| | | | | |
Lake Way[4] | | | | | |
Central | Granted | - | E53/1878 | 100% | 100% |
East | Application | - | E53/2057 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E53/1897 | 100% | 100% |
South | Application | - | E53/2059 | 100% | 100% |
South | Application | - | E53/2060 | 100% | 100% |
West | Application | - | L53/208 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Application | - | M53/1102 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Wells | | | | | |
Central | Granted | - | E38/2710 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E38/2821 | 100% | 100% |
North | Granted | - | E38/2824 | 100% | 100% |
Outer East | Granted | - | E38/3055 | 100% | 100% |
Single Block | Granted | - | E38/3056 | 100% | 100% |
Outer West | Granted | - | E38/3057 | 100% | 100% |
North West | Granted | - | E38/3124 | 100% | 100% |
West | Granted | - | L38/262 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | - | L38/263 | 100% | 100% |
South West | Granted | - | L38/264 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | L38/287 | 100% | 100% |
South Western | Granted | - | E38/3247 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | M38/1278 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Application | - | E38/3380 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Ballard | | | | | |
West | Granted | - | E29/912 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | - | E29/913 | 100% | 100% |
North | Granted | - | E29/948 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E29/958 | 100% | 100% |
South East | Granted | - | E29/1011 | 100% | 100% |
South East | Granted | - | E29/1020 | 100% | 100% |
South East | Granted | - | E29/1021 | 100% | 100% |
South East | Granted | - | E29/1022 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | Granted | E29/1067 | - | 100% |
South | Granted | Granted | E29/1068 | - | 100% |
East | Application | - | E29/1069 | 100% | 100% |
North | Granted | Granted | E29/1070 | - | 100% |
Lake Irwin | | | | | |
West | Granted | - | E37/1233 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Granted | - | E39/1892 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | - | E38/3087 | 100% | 100% |
North | Granted | - | E37/1261 | 100% | 100% |
Central East | Granted | - | E38/3113 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E39/1955 | 100% | 100% |
North West | Granted | - | E37/1260 | 100% | 100% |
South West | Granted | - | E39/1956 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Minigwal | | | | | |
West | Granted | - | E39/1893 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | - | E39/1894 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Granted | - | E39/1962 | 100% | 100% |
Central East | Granted | - | E39/1963 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E39/1964 | 100% | 100% |
South West | Granted | - | E39/1965 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Marmion | | | | | |
North | Granted | - | E29/1000 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Granted | - | E29/1001 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E29/1002 | 100% | 100% |
West | Granted | - | E29/1005 | 100% | 100% |
West | Application | - | E29/1069 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Noondie | | | | | |
North | Granted | - | E57/1062 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Granted | - | E57/1063 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E57/1064 | 100% | 100% |
West | Granted | - | E57/1065 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | - | E36/932 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Barlee | | | | | |
North | Granted | - | E30/495 | 100% | 100% |
Central | Granted | - | E30/496 | 100% | 100% |
South | Granted | - | E77/2441 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Raeside | | | | | |
North | Granted | - | E37/1305 | 100% | 100% |
Lake Austin | | | | | |
North | Application | - | E21/205 | 100% | 100% |
West | Application | - | E21/206 | 100% | 100% |
East | Granted | Granted | E58/529 | - | 100% |
South | Granted | Granted | E58/530 | - | 100% |
South West | Granted | Granted | E58/531 | - | 100% |
Lake Moore | | | | | |
Central | Granted | - | E59/2344 | 100% | 100% |
Northern Territory | | | | | |
Lake Lewis | | | | | |
South | Granted | - | EL 29787 | 100% | 100% |
North | Granted | - | EL 29903 | 100% | 100% |
Appendix 3 - asx aPPENDIX 5B
Appendix 5B
Mining exploration entity and oil and gas exploration entity quarterly report
Introduced 01/07/96 Origin Appendix 8 Amended 01/07/97, 01/07/98, 30/09/01, 01/06/10, 17/12/10, 01/05/13, 01/09/16
Name of entity | ||
Salt Lake Potash Limited | ||
ABN | | Quarter ended ("current quarter") |
98 117 085 748 | | 30 September 2019 |
Consolidated statement of cash flows | Current quarter $A'000 | Year to date (3 months) | ||
1. | Cash flows from operating activities | | | |
1.1 | Receipts from customers | |||
1.2 | Payments for | (9,040) | (9,040) | |
| (a) exploration & evaluation | |||
| (b) development | (2,196) | (2,196) | |
| (c) production | - | - | |
| (d) staff costs | (2,218) | (2,218) | |
| (e) administration and corporate costs | (637) | (637) | |
1.3 | Dividends received (see note 3) | - | - | |
1.4 | Interest received | 47 | 47 | |
1.5 | Interest and other costs of finance paid | (3) | (3) | |
1.6 | Income taxes paid | - | - | |
1.7 | Research and development refunds | - | - | |
1.8 | Other (provide details if material) - R&D Rebate Received |
(458) - |
(458) - | |
1.9 | Net cash from / (used in) operating activities | (14,505) | (14,505) | |
| ||||
2. | Cash flows from investing activities | (158) | (158) | |
2.1 | Payments to acquire: | |||
| (a) property, plant and equipment | |||
| (b) tenements (see item 10) | (3,000) | (3,000) | |
| (c) investments | - | - | |
| (d) other non-current assets | - | - | |
2.2 | Proceeds from the disposal of: | - | - | |
| (a) property, plant and equipment | |||
| (b) tenements (see item 10) | - | - | |
| (c) investments | - | - | |
| (d) other non-current assets | - | - | |
2.3 | Cash flows from loans to other entities | - | - | |
2.4 | Dividends received (see note 3) | - | - | |
2.5 | Other (provide details if material) | - | - | |
2.6 | Net cash from / (used in) investing activities | (3,158) | (3,158) | |
| ||||
3. | Cash flows from financing activities | 7,408 | 7,408 | |
3.1 | Proceeds from issues of shares | |||
3.2 | Proceeds from issue of convertible notes | - | - | |
3.3 | Proceeds from exercise of share options | - | - | |
3.4 | Transaction costs related to issues of shares, convertible notes or options | (97) | (97) | |
3.5 | Proceeds from borrowings | 14,817 | 14,817 | |
3.6 | Repayment of borrowings | (38) | (38) | |
3.7 | Transaction costs related to loans and borrowings |
|
| |
3.8 | Dividends paid | - | - | |
3.9 | Other (provide details if material) | - | - | |
3.10 | Net cash from / (used in) financing activities | 20,350 | 20,350 | |
| ||||
4. | Net increase / (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents for the period | 19,304 | 19,304 | |
4.1 | Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |||
4.2 | Net cash from / (used in) operating activities (item 1.9 above) | (14,505) | (14,505) | |
4.3 | Net cash from / (used in) investing activities (item 2.6 above) | (3,158) | (3,158) | |
4.4 | Net cash from / (used in) financing activities (item 3.10 above) | 20,350 | 20,350 | |
4.5 | Effect of movement in exchange rates on cash held |
|
| |
4.6 | Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | 21,989 | 21,989 | |
5. | Reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents | Current quarter | Previous quarter |
5.1 | Bank balances | 21,862 | 19,174 |
5.2 | Call deposits | 127 | 130 |
5.3 | Bank overdrafts | - | - |
5.4 | Other (provide details) | - | - |
5.5 | Cash and cash equivalents at end of quarter (should equal item 4.6 above) | 21,989 | 19,304 |
6. | Payments to directors of the entity and their associates | Current quarter |
6.1 | Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 | (109) |
6.2 | Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 | - |
6.3 | Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 6.1 and 6.2 | |
Payments include salaries, director and consulting fees and superannuation.
|
7. | Payments to related entities of the entity and their associates | Current quarter |
7.1 | Aggregate amount of payments to these parties included in item 1.2 | - |
7.2 | Aggregate amount of cash flow from loans to these parties included in item 2.3 | - |
7.3 | Include below any explanation necessary to understand the transactions included in items 7.1 and 7.2 | |
Not applicable.
|
8. | Financing facilities available | Total facility amount at quarter end | Amount drawn at quarter end |
8.1 | Loan facilities | 44,182 | 14,727 |
8.2 | Credit standby arrangements | - | - |
8.3 | Other (please specify) | - | - |
8.4 | Include below a description of each facility above, including the lender, interest rate and whether it is secured or unsecured. If any additional facilities have been entered into or are proposed to be entered into after quarter end, include details of those facilities as well. | ||
The Company has mandated Taurus Funds Management (as manager of the Taurus Mining Finance Fund L.P., Taurus Mining Finance Annex Fund L.P. and Taurus Mining Finance Fund No.2 L.P.) to provide up to US$150m project financing for the Lake Way Project. The Stage 1 Facility for US$30m (A$44.2m) has been documented and the Company has commenced draw down during the quarter. The facility is secured and interest is payable at 9.75% pa. The Project Development Facility (PDF) for up to US$150m (A$221m) will be used for refinancing the Stage 1 Facility and for project development and working capital associated with the development of the Lake Way Project. Draw down of the PDF is subject to a number of Conditions Precedent. The PDF will be secured and interest will be payable at 9.00% pa. As the loan is denominated in USD, the facility amount and amount drawn down has been converted at an FX rate of $0.679 USD/AUD, being the FX crossrate at 30 September 2019. |
9. | Estimated cash outflows for next quarter | $A'000 |
9.1 | Exploration and evaluation | 7,000 |
9.2 | Development | 6,000 |
9.3 | Production | - |
9.4 | Staff costs | 3,000 |
9.5 | Administration and corporate costs | 750 |
9.6 | Other (provide details if material) - Blackham transaction consideration - Long lead deposits |
4,000 |
9.7 | Total estimated cash outflows | 28,000 |
10. | Changes in tenements | Tenement reference and location | Nature of interest | Interest at beginning of quarter | Interest at end of quarter |
10.1 | Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements lapsed, relinquished or reduced | | Refer to Appendix 1 | | |
10.2 | Interests in mining tenements and petroleum tenements acquired or increased | | | | |
Compliance statement
1 This statement has been prepared in accordance with accounting standards and policies which comply with Listing Rule 19.11A.
2 This statement gives a true and fair view of the matters disclosed.
Sign here: ............................................................ Date: 31 October 2019
(Director/Company secretary)
Print name: Clint McGhie
Notes
1. The quarterly report provides a basis for informing the market how the entity's activities have been financed for the past quarter and the effect on its cash position. An entity that wishes to disclose additional information is encouraged to do so, in a note or notes included in or attached to this report.
2. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards, the definitions in, and provisions of, AASB 6: Exploration for and Evaluation of Mineral Resources and AASB 107: Statement of Cash Flows apply to this report. If this quarterly report has been prepared in accordance with other accounting standards agreed by ASX pursuant to Listing Rule 19.11A, the corresponding equivalent standards apply to this report.
3. Dividends received may be classified either as cash flows from operating activities or cash flows from investing activities, depending on the accounting policy of the entity.
[1] In accordance with the Blackham Transaction, refer ASX Announcements dated 23 July 2019 and 8 October 2019.
[2] CRU SOP Market Study May 2019
[3] EPA non-assessment decision was received June 2019 and relates to the Lake Way SOP Demonstration Plant submission
[4] Acquisition of Lake Way tenements from Blackham Resources completed in October 2019.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution of this information may apply. For further information, please contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
NO INVESTMENT ADVICE
The Company is a publisher. You understand and agree that no content published on the Site constitutes a recommendation that any particular security, portfolio of securities, transaction, or investment strategy is...
FOR OUR FULL DISCLAIMER CLICK HERE